This Blog has now moved to idebate.org/worlddebating - all future posts will be made there!
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label United States. Show all posts

13 April 2012

The IPPF Finals live online

LIVE From New York...
The IPPF Finals
 
By the end of tomorrow, there will be a new "IPPF World Champion!"

On Saturday, you can watch as the "Elite Eight" teams in the 11th Annual Bickel & Brewer/New York University International Public Policy Forum (IPPF) compete in oral debates in New York City.
Simply visit www.bickelbrewer.com/ippf to see the following events LIVE!

IPPF Finals LIVE Viewing Schedule:

Saturday, April 14
Semifinal #1 - 10:15 a.m. ET
Semifinal #2 - 11:45 p.m. ET
Final Debate - 3:30 p.m. ET
Awards Ceremony - 8 p.m. ET
During the Final Debate, you can vote online for the winning team! Your vote will help decide which team takes home the $10,000 grand prize!
The 2011-12 IPPF
"Elite Eight"
 



Brooklyn Technical High School
Brooklyn, New York

Lakewood High School
Lakewood, Colorado

Notre Dame High School
Sherman Oaks, California

Peak to Peak Charter School
Lafayette, Colorado

St. Mark's School of Texas
Dallas, Texas

Team Czech Republic
Prague, Czech Republic

Team Singapore
Singapore

The Home Educator's Outsourcing Solution
Plano, Texas

12 April 2012

La Verne 100 Years Debate Tournament


Recently, the University of La Verne held its 1st Annual 100 Years Debate Tournament. Rob Ruiz, the Director of Forensics at the University of La Verne, wanted to create a tournament that would carry a tradition for 100 years with a unique twist on the implementation as well as granting much of the logistical powers to ULV students. The CA who came up with the motions and carried out the majority of the functions for tournament was Ari Lamb. Will Reilley was the Tab Director for the 20 team tournament. This was the first tournament Ari has been a CA as well as Will tabbing, and they both did an amazing job.

            The twist at this tournament that will last for the next 99 years was mirrored from the AustralAsian style of debate. Each of the 5 preliminary rounds had TWO motions based on a theme. The rooms were announced and the respective teams had to find each team that were in their respective rooms. The CA announced two motions and the four teams voted on the motion they wanted to debate. If there was a tie, the Opening Government had tie-breaking authority and the round would debate that particular motion. In order to best prepare for finding the teams and then vote on a motion, prep time was 20 minutes long. There were 4 preliminary rounds on Saturday, one preliminary round on Sunday, and then a break to Semis and then to Finals. All break rounds also had two motions. The feedback was extraordinaire. The tournament was a fun, relaxing time, with top competition to prepare for US NATS.

            The trophy was built by ULV alumni and participant in the tournament, Nick McGrail. The trophy is large enough to carry 100 plaques that will include the names of those who made the Final, the year it was held, and the Winning Team names. At the end of the 100 years, the University or College that wins the tournament will be able to keep this historic piece of artwork.

The top 5 Speakers of the tournament were:
1.      JJ Rodriguez
2.      Rob Ruiz
3.      Emily Ravenscroft
4.      Ryan Mansell
5.      Thomas Allison

The Finals included:

Opening Government: The Vagina Monologues (Ryan Mansell & Corey Teter)
Opening Opposition: WTFWJD? (Josh Martin & Carl Decker)
Closing Government: Old Hacks for Sack (JJ Rodriguez & Ernie Minner)
Closing Opposition: Lubed by Liquor (Emily Ravenscroft and Rob Ruiz)

Winners: Lubed by Liquid (Emily Ravenscroft and Rob Ruiz)

 Judging Panel: Chair: Ari Lamb
 Panelists: Ian Lising, Tanya Alsheikh, Nikkia Williams, Will Reilley, Dafne  Gokcen,  Mica Anderson,
                                                           

Final Motion (Chosen): THW teach Fetish Classes in High School
                             Other:   THBT Sex Ed should broaden its teaching to pleasure.

Semis: (Chosen): THW allow for gay adoption
             (Chosen): THBT transgendered individuals should be able to participate in
                                beauty pageants.
Preliminaries:

Round 1: THBT the EU should have a standing army
               TH supports sending aid to North Korea

Round 2: THW drill in National Parks
                THW release animals back into their natural habitat

Round 3: THW require zombie apocalypse training for the military
                 THW force all superheroes to register their true identity to the
                  Government

Round 4: THW rescue child soldiers
                 THW use death row inmates for medical testing

Round 5: THW encourage the creation of Islamic Courts inside the United States
                 TH supports the military burning of the Koran in Afghanistan

Video of Colgate IV Final

From John Adams:




30 March 2012

Watch Colgate University IV live

The Championship Round of the Colgate University IV will be streaming live on the web on Sunday April 1 at 4:00pm New York time at: http://www.livestream.com/cunow

A recording of the round will also be posted on the Colgate Speaking Union's Vimeo site at: http://vimeo.com/colgatespeakingunion/videos


9 March 2012

100 years of debating at La Verne

 The weekend of March 9, 10, and 11 marks the Centennial for the University of La Verne Debate Team. March 11, 1912 was the day that the Lordsburg Debate College Academy held its very first public debate with the motion, “Be it resolved that Capital Punishment should be abolished.” 100 years later, the University of La Verne commemorates the occasion with three events designed to honor their past, celebrate their present, and inspire their future.

Friday March 9 will kick off the weekend with the Championship round of the La Verne Faculty Debate Series. For over a month, the La Verne Debate Team has hosted a series of debates in the BP format for La Verne Faculty. After the preliminary rounds, the Final Round will involve Dr. Bill Cook, Professor Sean Dillon, Dr. Jerome Garcia, Dr. Issam Ghazzawi, Dr. Jay Jones, Dr. Ken Marcus, Dr. Jason Neidleman, and Dr. Kat Weaver.

Saturday March 10 will continue with the Lordsburg Union Public Debate. Former ULV debater Nathan Baca, now an Investigative Reporter for KLAS-TV Las Vegas, will participate in a public address and then debate on the motion with current ULV debaters, on the motion, “This House believes that media has destroyed the democratic process.”

Culminating on Sunday March 11, 100 years to the day, the best of La Verne will debate the very same motion that occurred on March 11, 1912. The Opening Government team consists of 2001 Cambridge IV Semifinalist Ernie Minner and 2001 World Semifinalist Stefan Chacon. The Opening Opposition team consists of 2007 US Nationals Champion Rob Ruiz and 2008 US Nationals Finalist Thomas Allison. The Closing Government team consists of the 2000 Sydney World Universities Debate Championship Finalists JJ Rodriguez and Sean Krispinsky. The Closing Opposition team consists of 2006 US National Open Champion John Patrick and 2007 US Nationals Debate Champion Josh Martin.

All the events will be held in the evening at the newly renovated Steve and Ann Morgan Auditorium. These events are open to the public as well as any friends and alumni of ULV. The host for the weekend is none other than the prestigious and kind, World’s Chair Emeritus Ian Lising. With every legacy around our debate community, La Verne is proud to continue the tradition of debate and rhetoric on a grand scale. La Verne Debate: “changing the world, one word at a time.”

21 February 2012

Pan-American Universities Debating Championship

The Lawrence Debate Union of the University of Vermont will be hosting the Pan-American Universities Debating Championship on March 23rd and 24th. This tournament will be the first of 2012 to be conducted in Spanish. The format of this tournament is the British Parliamentary style of debate. An excellent and experienced adjudication team will set the topics. 

We are currently attempting to bring more institutions into the fold and provide access to a debate tournament for students who are either native Spanish speakers, or the students who are particularly advanced speakers. If you could forward this email to students within your department who you think may be interested in this type of event, it would be greatly appreciated.

If you (or any others) have questions they should feel free to contact me at john.sadek@uvm.edu

For more information, please see:
or

Best Regards,
John Sadek

12 February 2012

Kinkaid Seeks Head of Debate Program, Middle School Debate Teacher/Coach

The Kinkaid School in Houston, Texas has two debate openings beginning in August. For more information, please contact Jim Dunaway (jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>>><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>>>><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>>><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org><mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org<mailto:jim.dunaway@kinkaid.org>>>>>), Dean of Faculty.


Head of Debate Program

Duties:  Organizes and runs a nationally competitive debate program; develops the debate curriculum and teaches Upper School Debate classes; supports the Middle School debate teacher; organizes team travel and arranges logistical support; stays abreast of current debate topics; helps students research and develop arguments; organizes after school work sessions; monitors student academic performance; advises a small group of students; carries out other routine duties as assigned; travels with team to major national tournaments (about 2-3 per month).

Requirements for the position include significant experience as coach and debater; experience with, and enjoyment of, this age group; at least a bachelor’s degree in an academic field; availability to work with students after regular school hours; ability to travel frequently.

Kinkaid’s debate program is recognized nationally for its excellence and participates regularly in the most competitive local, regional, and national high school tournaments.  Kinkaid is highly competitive in both Lincoln-Douglas and policy debate.

Middle School Debate Teacher/Coach

Kinkaid’s debate program is recognized nationally for its excellence and participates regularly in the most competitive local, regional, and national high school tournaments.  Kinkaid is highly competitive in both Lincoln-Douglas and policy debate.

Duties:  teaches seventh and eighth grade debate and one or two middle or upper school classes in a discipline such as English or history, coaches the middle school debate team, shares weekend debate tournament responsibilities with the director of debate, and advises a small group of middle school students.

Requirements:  experience as a debater, and preferably as a coach; experience with, and enjoyment of, this age group; at least a bachelor’s degree in an academic field; availability to work with students after regular school hours; ability to travel frequently.

Contact: Jim Dunaway
Dean of Faculty
The Kinkaid School

6 February 2012

2012 Madison Cup Debates Invite‏

On behalf of the James Madison Center, and JMU Debate we are pleased and excited to invite you to compete for the Madison Cup at the 12th annual “James Madison Commemorative Debate and Citizens Forum” on Thursday, April 12th, 2012.

The James Madison Commemorative Debate and Citizens Forum is a unique inter-collegiate debate competition, which combines the excitement and challenge of tournament competition with the relevance and empowerment of a public audience and audience participation.  

We are pleased to continue our partnership with The Arthur N. Rupe Foundation. The funding provided by the Rupe Foundation allows us to provide prize money to the top ten teams, the top twelve debaters and three teams qualifying for travel stipends.

2012 Topic: This House stands resolved that: The United States has an obligation to support emerging democracies in the Middle East and Northern Africa

Other cool and unique features:
                *$30,000.00 in prize money
                *Debating and competing in front of public audiences
                *No entry fees
                *Continental breakfast, snacks and lunch provided
                *Video web-cast of the final round
                *Great PR for your debate program

The tournament details are enclosed with this letter.  If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

We look forward to hosting you in April!

Mike Davis, Ph. D.                                                                            Pete Bsumek, Ph.D.
Co-Director, Madison Cup Debates                                          Co-Director, Madison Cup Debates
School of Comm. Studies                                                              School of Comm. Studies
James Madison University                                                           James Madison University
(O) 540-568-7308                                                                              (O) 540-568-3386
(E-mail) davismk@jmu.edu                                                         (E-mail) bsumekpk@jmu.edu

Background: The James Madison Center at James Madison University sponsors the event in the spirit of James Madison's ideal that a republican democracy is healthy only when informed and civil debate thrives. The final round will be broadcast on the World Wide Web.  Last year’s debate featured teams from American University, City University of New York, Claremont Colleges, Cornell University, George Mason University, James Madison University, Liberty University, Piedmont College, Southeastern College, Towson University, University of Alaska, University of Mary Washington, University of Richmond, University of Vermont, Virginia Commonwealth University, Wake Forest University, and Yale University.

The Arthur N. Rupe Foundation has agreed to serve as the sponsor for the 2012 Madison Cup and we are humbled by their continued commitment to furthering public debate. They have agreed to maintain team and student awards from last year, as well increasing travel stipends to a total of $10,000 for teams that qualify through the application process outlined below.

We are hopeful that this will be the strongest field that we have had so please enter early.

Eligible Participants:  Each school may enter one two-person team.  The debate is open to undergraduate students who are in good standing at their respective institutions.  Second teams will be considered on a case-by-case basis, if space permits. 

Competition Format:  The debate uses a “long table” format.  This is a public debate.   Last year there was an audience of around 500 people for the final round, preliminary rounds were smaller (audiences of 20-30 people).   The “long table” format features three (two person) teams on each side of the question.  Speeches start with the affirmative and alternate between the affirmative and negative throughout the debate.  Teams are randomly assigned to sides and speaker positions.  In other words, if a team is selected to be the first affirmative, they will give the first two affirmative speeches in the debate.  The first and last speeches on each side of the question are uninterruptible.  Any member of the opposing team may interrupt the speeches in the middle of the debate in order to ask the speaker to yield to a question.  Speakers are not required to answer these questions (although not answering questions may cause the audience to think that the speaker is “dodgy”).  Please see the example format below for more information.  You can view the 2010 final round at: http://www.jmu.edu/debate/madisoncup/2010.shtml

Jury Adjudication Procedure:  A three to seven member panel, or jury, will adjudicate the debate.  Juries will be comprised of local residents, students, professors, distinguished JMU alumni, and special invited guests.  At the completion of the debate, the panel will adjourn to discuss, deliberate and decide upon the winners as a group.  The jury votes for (2-person) teams, not sides of the question.  In other words, first place could go to an affirmative team, while second place could be awarded to a negative team. 

Tournament Procedures:
*Number of rounds: This year we will offer three preliminary rounds of debate and one final round.
*Switch side debate: Each team will debate at least once on the affirmative and once on the negative. 
*Side & position:  Sides (affirmative or negative), and positions (first affirmative team, first negative team, second affirmative team, etc) for the preliminary debates will be determined by random drawing.
*Judging: Judges will rank teams 1-6 in each preliminary debate, and assign each team quality points based on a one hundred point scale (1-100).
*Advancing to the final round: The six teams with the lowest total ranks will advance to the final round.  Quality points will be used to break ties.
*Sides and Speaking Positions in the final round:  Sides and speaking positions in the final round will be based on seeding after the preliminary rounds.  For example, the first seeded team will choose their “side and position,” then the second seed will choose “side and position,” and so on.

Public Participation:  While the jury deliberates, the floor will be opened for audience comments and speeches.  An award for the best floor speech will be presented.  Local newspapers, politicians, and the general public are invited.

Awards:  The first place team will leave with the Madison Cup—a very nice traveling trophy. Once again this year there is a $15,000.00 purse of prize money.  All participants in the final round will be recognized with awards.
                                Prize money will be awarded as follows:
                                1st place: $5000.00 donation to your debate program
                                2nd place: $3000.00 donation to your debate program
                                3rd place: $2000.00 donation to your debate program
                                4th—6th place: $1000.00 donation to your debate program
                                7th-10th place: $500.00 donation to your debate program

Any student who participates in the final round will receive a prize to be distributed in the form of a scholarship. The top team will receive $2,000 per student and the remaining students in the final round will receive $1,000. This is a doubling of student prize money from last year.

Entry:  There are no entry fees. We can accommodate a field of 36 teams.  Entry is on a first come, first serve basis.  The first 18 teams to enter are guaranteed a spot in the field, after that we will accept teams, if we can generate a field divisible by 4 or 6.  Deadline for entry is March 15th.  This is necessary so we can determine how many debates there will be in each round.  Send school info, team info (first and last names of debaters) and requests for additional teams to:  Dr. Mike Davis, davismk@jmu.edu

Travel Stipend: This year we are pleased to offer a travel stipend of $2,000 to three teams that are able to demonstrate that they would add significantly to the quality and diversity of teams participating in this year’s competition. In addition to these stipends we are also able to offer and additional $4,000 in smaller stipends to schools that are on the East Coast or would only require partial assistance. To complete your application for travel stipends please visit: http://jmu.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_3ZUZCKc3WFPUype

Your application should be submitted by March 1st. We will use the following criteria when deciding which teams are awarded the stipend:

·         Quality of Team- What is the team’s competitive success? Do they have prior public debate experience?

·         Diversity- How does the team add to the diversity of the event? Things such as regional, institution, debate format will all be considered.

·         Budget – What level of funding does your administration provide? How many students does that budget currently serve? Would the team be able to attend the competition otherwise?

·         Previous Competitor – Is your school new to the competition? Will participation in this event/receiving the stipend assist in future development of your debate program?

 Lodging: We have reserved a block of hotel rooms at two area hotels. Both rates will be available until March 18th.

 The Best Western Inn.  The phone number for the Best Western is 540-433-6089.  The rate for 1-4 people per room is $56.00 + tax.  When calling the Best Western Inn please mention that you are attending the Madison Cup debates at JMU.
The Comfort Inn. The phone number for The Comfort Inn is (540) 433-6066. The rate is 1-4 people per room is $79 + tax. When calling please mention that you are attending the Madison Cup debates at JMU.

 Travel:  James Madison University is located in Harrisonburg, VA, which is two hours southwest of Washington, D.C. on I-81.  If you plan to fly consider Dullas and Washington National/Reagan Airports in Washington DC (2 hours away), Richmond airport (2 hours away), Charlottesville airport (one hour away) and the Shenandoah Regional Airport (15 minutes away).  We will arrange transport from Shenandoah and Charlottesville, we’ll do our best to work with you from the others.

Schedule:
Thursday, April 12th, 2012:  James Madison Commemorative Debate and Citizens Forum
8:00 AM: Pick up at the Best Western or Warsaw Street Parking Deck
8:00AM-9:00AM  registration and Announcements
9:30 AM: Preliminary debate round 1
11:00 AM Preliminary debate round 2
1:00 PM Lunch
2:00PM: Preliminary debate round 3 (announcement of the final round participants)
5:00 PM: Final round (followed by the presentation of the Madison Cup)

Example Debate Format: The 2004 final round proceeded as follows.

1st Affirmative Speech (Wake Forest #1): (4 minutes) uninterrupted

 1st Negative Speech (George Mason #1): (4 minutes) uninterrupted

 2nd Affirmative Speech (Wake Forest  #2): (5 minutes):  The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 2nd Negative Speech (George Mason #2): (5 minutes): The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 3rd Affirmative Speech (Georgetown # 1): (5 minutes): The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 3rd Negative Speech (James Madison #1): (5 minutes): The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 4th Affirmative Speech (Georgetown #2): (5 minutes) The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 4th Negative Speech (James Madison #2): (5 minutes) The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 5th Affirmative Speech (Mary Washington #1):  (5 minutes) The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 5th Negative Speech (Towson #1): The first and last minute of the speech are uninterruptible.  In the 2nd-4th minutes of the speech any opposition debater may ask the speaker to yield to a question.  The speaker may accept, or decline the question.

 6th Affirmative Speech (Mary Washington #2):  (4 minutes) Uninterrupted

 6th Negative Speech (Towson University #2):  (4 minutes) Uninterrupted



Michael Davis
Assistant Professor/Director of Debate
James Madison University

29 January 2012

HWS / IDEA Round Robin Applications Due

APPLICATION DEADLINE: January 31

To apply, just e-mail a debating CV for each debater to Eric Barnes (barnes@hws.edu).

International teams should also indicate:
1) if they would need any travel subsidy in order to attend;
2) the minimum subsidy that would allow them to attend, if accepted;

As always, we have a fairly limited budget for travel subsidies, and priority will be given first to teams from teams who cannot afford the expense (as opposed to being unwilling) and second to teams for whom travel expenses are exceptionally high. Our maximum travel subsidy is $1000 per team, but they are typically less than this.
We will have decisions on applications by February 14.

JUDGING:
Our judging pool is almost full, but please contact us if you are a highly qualified BP judge who is interested in being a part of the 2012 Round Robin.

12 January 2012

America's Cup just before USU‏

Participate in the Race for the Cup!

http://debate.uvm.edu/debateblog/americascup/

Teams composed of any two individuals from any nation may apply for a
space in the America’s Cup Debates, to be held 12 April 2012 on the
campus of Willamette University in Oregon, the day before the US
Universities Debating Championship. Sixteen teams will be chosen for the
contest, a seeding round, a quarterfinal, semifinal and then a final
round to occur in the evening as a major public debate. The format is WUDC.

Interested parties should offer their brief debating particulars to the
Convener, Alfred Snider of the University of Vermont.

The first wave of slots will be announced in the middle of January of 2012.

alfred.snider@uvm.edu

6 December 2011

St. John's University Seeks Debate Graduate

Dear Friends,

Beginning in Fall 2012, the St. John's University Debate Society in Queens, NY, has a graduate assistant position available to people interested in graduate study and teaching the art of Worlds-style debating.

Candidates for this position must demonstrate a record of success in either the worlds format or some equivalent debating format on the national or international level, and must apply and be accepted to one of St. John's University's many graduate study programs. Candidates will also be interviewed via phone/Skype.

The assistantship provides 12 credits of graduate-level coursework per semester and a $6,000 stipend per academic year. 

Interested persons should examine the University's offerings of masters and doctoral programs. This assistantship will cover all academic programs that matriculate toward a Master's degree or Doctoral degree in any University department, but preference is given to those candidates who wish to study in St. John's College of Liberal Arts and Sciences. The list of all available degree programs can be found here: http://www.stjohns.edu/admission/graduate/programs

Applicants should contact the program of interest to determine application requirements and deadlines. After applying, candidates should email the Director of Debate, Steve Llano, Ph.D. (llanos@stjohns.edu) and let him know what program you have applied for and your "x number" which will be assigned upon application, as well as letter of application and a debate CV.

The St. John's University Debate Society was founded in 2007 and competes nationally and internationally in Worlds/British Parliamentary debating. The campus is located in Jamaica, Queens, New York City and is easily accessible via mass transit from Manhattan. The Debate Society, an academic program housed in the Department of Rhetoric, Communication and Theater at the University, is an open club where pedagogy in argumentation is prioritized.

Graduate Assistants will be responsible for the following:

- Attend all STJ Debate Society meetings (2 per week)
- Schedule appointments with debaters to work on tutorials in speaking, research, or other subjects of interest.
- Schedule and judge practice debates weekly.
- Travel with the team to tournaments on some weekends - we usually have a travel schedule of up to 15 competitions per year.
- Assist with planning, paperwork, and other bureaucratic aspects of the STJ Debate society, including discussions of long term planning.
- Assist students as needed with community outreach work such as public debates and school workshops, as well as development events.

The assistantship is a 18-20 hour per week commitment, and candidates could find other employment if they wish to supplement the assistantship.

All materials must be submitted by February 1st, 2012, but many degree programs have an earlier deadline, so candidates are advised to study the guidelines for the degree of interest carefully.

For any and all questions regarding this position, please email Dr. Steve Llano (llanos@stjohns.edu)

14 November 2011

Cornell win HWS Fall Classic

Cornell SB (Danny Blackman & Lean Salgado) have won the 2011 Hobart and William Smith Colleges Fall Classic.  They defeated U Penn VC (Vishwanath & Chong) in the final. 

Brandeis (Brad Burns & David Altman) won the Novice competiton

More details can be found at Elims Team Tab Speaker Tab

25 October 2011

Stanford & Williams Hybrid team win Yale IV

The Stanford & Williams College hybrid team of Shengwu Li (formerly Oxford) and Anser Aftab (formerly LSE) have won the 2011 Yale IV. 

The final line up was
OG: Stanford (Michael & Faris)
OO: Cornell (Ryan & Kirat)
CG: Vermont (Gross & Adamczyk)
CO: Stanford/Williams (Shengwu & Anser)

Motions:
Final: This house believes that the end of US hegemony is good for the world
Semi: This house would allow and enforce pre-nuptial agreements that punish adultery with jail time. Semi
Qtr: This house believes that scientific journals shouldnt publish research on the subject of racial disparities in intelligence
R5: Where someone's mental health renders them unfit to stand trial, this house would forcibly treat them to allow them to stand trial
R4: This house believes that universities should disclose to admitted students, upon their request, if aff action affected their admission
R3: This house would prohibit folks who've been full time employees of political parties or the government from lobbying
R2: This house believes courts should be able to issue assassination warrants.
R1: This house would punish financial professionals who fail to report others' insider trading as if they had committed the insider trading themselves.



I'm still waiting for the tab but will post a link once I get it.

Source various on twitter but especially http://twitter.com/#!/DebateTourney

13 October 2011

Loyola Marymont win US Open 2011

Loyola Marymount A (James Mollison & Jack Ewing) have won the 2011 US Open Debating Championships.

Final: Motion: This House supports a weak dollar.
OG St. John’s A
OO Loyola Marymount A
CG La Verne F CG
CO Loyola Marymount B CO
Judges: Rob Margesson, Steve West, Rachel Fabian


Semifinals Motion: This House supports drone strikes
OG St. John’s A
OO Loyola Marymount C
CG Regis A
CO Loyola Marymount B
Judges: Josh Martin, Rob Ruiz, Brian Pride

OG Loyola Marymount A
OO Vermont A
CG La Verne H
CO La Verne F
Judges: Rob Margesson, Steve Llano, Steve West

The full tab can be found here 

12 October 2011

Interesting end to Kentucky Policy Debate


Rob Ruiz, Director of Forensics at the University of LaVerne sent me an interesting story that it has taken me a couple of days to get my head around.  The story goes like this:

At the recent Policy Debate competition at Kentucky University (one of the largest Policy debate competitions in the US) the Loyola Marymount team of James Mollison and Jack Ewing went undefeated in every round and picked up all the ballots. They ended up breaking and made it through the knock out rounds to the Final, collecting all the ballots except "one," which didn't matter since they beat the 3rd through 8th best team in the competition and ended up in the Final against the number 2 school, Georgetown.

Upon finding out that the two finalists from Georgetown were African American and then finding out that the final was to be held at Campbell Hall, a "former" slave house, the Loyola Marymount team (two Caucasian students) immediately found this Georgetown team to have a discussion. The Loyola team offered to give Georgetown the ballots as well as the WIN in finals if they choose NOT to have a Final debate and instead, spend the time allotted to have a discussion on racial problems considering this tournament final was in a former slave house named Campbell Hall and one of the finalist's last names was actually Campbell. They tell them that a racial forum involving everyone is far more important to them and the Georgetown team decides to accept. For the next couple of hours, the entire tournament becomes a forum for discussion about the racial issues facing society today.

Now this story is certainly an interesting one.  As a person focused on competitive debating my initial reaction was why the hell did they agree to concede the final and instead hold an open discussion about racial issues.  Surely there are more than enough discussions about the problems of society in the media.  Would the audience, organizers and sponsors not be disappointed not to get a debate on some prepared topic.

However on reflection this shows a willingness to forgo the glory of competition to instead debate more fundamental problems in wider society.  Remember that initially debating societies were set up not to compete among each other but to give students a chance to hone their rhetorical skills by discussing the important issues of the day.  Once the great chambers of university debating were some of the few places where people could go and watch the major topics discussed.  Perhaps we may think that the media has replaced this with a near constant stream of discussion panels on radio and TV. However that assumes that there is a free media in the country and that a “free” media does not have an editorial agenda dictated from on high. 

I’m sure there were people who were disappointed that they did not get to watch a formal debate that night.  However I would use this story as an opportunity to remind people that the weekly meetings in your debating society need not be, and in fact should not be, about preparing for Worlds, Regionals or Nationals.  You can easily hold competitive debates in smaller training sessions.  Instead debating societies should use at least some of their main weekly public meetings to hold large, open, balanced debates on issues of public interest. It may be an issue related to your local college or it may be a discussion on a global crisis.  Whatever the topic debating societies are uniquely positioned to give students a chance to listen to and take part in discussions about issues that impact on them (even if they don’t realize it).  Debating societies can invite guest speakers to address the student body that no other society would attract.

Now it may be that you think your society does not have the resources to do this. Well in my experience most colleges like large public debates because they attract media attention and it takes very little spin to conjur up images of Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard etc in the minds of university officials. If you are willing to hold large debates on issues of public interest you will find that the resources to do so tend to be easier to come by than you may suspect.  You may be in a coach led club rather than a student led society and believe you as a mere student have no control over what debates happen. Well in my experience most good coaches are happy to have their students take the lead on organizing events within the debate club. Ask and see what happens.

So as I said on first reaction I thought the decision of Loyola and Georgetown was a strange one. But on reflection I believe it may show that in the drive towards a global competitive circuit we have lost focus on some of the core benefits debating societies should bring to their local student body.  If you are in a debating society that has never organized a public debate why not add it to your to do list for this academic year.

27 September 2011

Registration Underway for the 2011-12 International Public Policy Forum

Is your debate team looking for a new challenge? Registration is currently underway for the 2011-12 Bickel & Brewer/New York University International Public Policy Forum (IPPF).
 
The IPPF is the only contest that gives students across the globe the opportunity to engage in written and oral debates on issues of public policy -- for free. Students compete for cash prizes and the chance to be one of eight teams invited on an all-expense-paid trip to the IPPF Finals in New York City! In New York, the IPPF World Champion is awarded a $10,000 (USD) grand prize!
 
To participate, your team can register by clicking this link:
 
 
The deadline to register is October 12. Your team should then construct a 2,800 word qualifying round essay on the IPPF topic, "Resolved: Human missions should be a significant focus of space exploration." Qualifying round essays can be written in the affirmative or the negative, but must be submitted to ippf@bickelbrewer.com by October 26, 2011. 
 
The Top 32 teams earn cash awards and advance into a single-elimination, written debate contest -- volleying essays back and forth via e-mail until only eight teams are left standing. Those eight teams compete in oral debates in New York City in front of an elite panel of judges that includes NYU President John Sexton and Bickel & Brewer Partner William A. Brewer III.
 
To learn more, visit www.bickelbrewer.com/ippf today! This could be the year your team is named the IPPF World Champion!
 

The information contained in this e-mail message, including any attachments, is attorney privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named as addressee. The review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication by or to anyone other than the intended addressee is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.

2 September 2011

International Public Policy Forum

The International Public Policy Forum, co-sponsored by Bickel and Brewer, and the NYU Law school,. ss a free competition open to high school students from anywhere in the world, with over $50,000 in prize money for the winners. Additionally, teams advancing to the "elite 8" (octofinalis) win an all-expense paid trip to New York City to compete in oral arguments.

This year's topic has just been announced- Resolved: Human missions should be a significant focus of space exploration. Teams can register at www.bickelbrewer.com/ippf. Teams qualify by writing an essay in proposition or opposition to the motion and must be submitted to ippf@bickelbrewer.com by October 26, 2011.

The competition is a great opportunity for high schools to get to compete on an international level, especially those which don't have budgets to travel.