This Blog has now moved to idebate.org/worlddebating - all future posts will be made there!

28 September 2007

Tips: Public Speaking

World Public Speaking Championships Rules
One thing you are bound to notice is the different speaking styles used by speakers. Speaking style is perhaps one of the most difficult aspects of debating to attempt to "teach". You will have to develop your own style and preferably one that comes naturally to you. However there are a couple of things to be kept in mind.
  1. You must speak clearly and loudly enough so that your voice can be heard by everyone. Remember the adjudicators will sit towards the rear of the hall so at the very least they must be able to hear what you are saying if you are to have any chance of winning. However you shouldn't shout as the halls have generally been designed so that your voice will carry towards the back.
  2. Try to avoid monotone. If you are making an important point use your voice to stress it and make it stand out. Try to slowly increase the stress and force behind your voice as you go through your speech. Build up to a high point and make this the crucial point of your speech. However don't bring the audience on a rollercoaster ride. Don't start high, fall down, build-up and fall down again, it looks as though you are only convinced about the truth of half your speech
  3. Keep eye-contact with the audience and don't stare at the podium. It gets easier to do this after some experience and once you use fewer notes. Some people like to pick out individuals in the audience and look at them. Others just speak to the audience as a whole. However you do it make sure to scan the audience and move your gaze to different parts of the hall regularly.
  4. Use your body language to back up your speech. If you stand rigidly and don't move then you will find it very difficult to have any real conviction in your voice. Use your arms and facial expressions to convey your emotions and back up your speech. However don't go overboard, you want the audience's attention to be focused on your speech not your arms. Try not to have anything in your hands. Some people like to carry a pen and end up waving it about like a baton which can distract the adjudicators. If you really need something use index cards.
  5. You don't have to stand strictly behind the podium. Move around a bit and face different sections of the audience at different times. Apparently studies have shown that people tend to prefer to be able to see the whole person as this is supposed to indicate that you aren't hiding anything. However, once again, don't go overboard. It annoys people (and more importantly adjudicators) if you walk too far from the podium. Try not to go more than 1-2 meters away from the podium. One way to ensure this is to leave your notes on the podium, you'll find yourself reluctant to move too far from them.
  6. Don't be too complicated. If your argument is too elaborate people may have difficulty following it. Don't use 15 syllable Latin words when a 2 syllable English word will do. Remember you are trying to convince the audience that your argument is the best and not that you consider your talent wasted on them (even if it is).
  7. Use humour to help win over the audience and make your speech stand out. If you have a natural talent for comedy or impersonations etc. then use it. If you don't then don't worry about it, even the most serious of us can be funny at times (often even without meaning it). You can work out a few put downs and one-liners in advance but be careful. If a joke sounds too prepared than it may bomb. Try to make it sound spontaneous and it's more likely to be successful.
  8. The best thing to do is watch other speakers and see how they combine the various elements. Experiment with different styles and try to find one that you are comfortable with. However the only real way to develop a good style is to try to speak on a regular basis and listen to the advice of adjudicators and the more experienced debaters.

URGENT:WUDC 2008 registration update

Dear All,
We have hit our team cap of 360 as announced two or so weeks ago. There are no more adjudicator slots now available. We have around 50 teams on the waiting list. We have a few adjudicators on waiting list also. Ladies and gentleman, we really appreciate all your excitement and support. We ask for your patience as the organizing committee clears out important matters. We are working hard to enforce policies which will ensure the quality of this tournament.

I am receiving hundreds of request from institutions each and every day. I cannot entertain any request till I am given a clear signal from the adjudication core. We have to come to an consensus. We have to make sure the adjudication core can accomodate all these teams, the logistics can support all these teams. If the budget is there for accepting more teams etc? We are sticking to our cap of 360 as of now. There is no moving away from that. Please try to understand our situation as an hosting institution. We ask for your support and cooperation. I have a lot of people very stressed out and angry people emailing me, please just be patient. The waiting list is very long and I cannot confirm anything till I am sure about which teams have dropped, which teams are changing their number of teams and adjudicators and what the adjudication core decide.

I would like to apologize to certain institutions that communicated with me in mid August regarding payments. They asked if it was ok for them to transfer money 3rd week during Late registration phase. AT that time , based on the number of teams that had been paid for, I estimated we wouldn't hit our cap by then, therefore I inform them they would have a good chance to get slots. I did not confirm to them their slots. My emails from last week of August all the way till announcement of late registration did clearly warn people that slots were being taken fast.

During the last week of August and between September 1- 5, the number of teams multiplied two folds. Number of teams were increasing by 20-30 per night. Once late registration open, within a few days, all slots were grabbed. We hit our cap way sooner than I expected. A lot of teams continued to register and transfer funds, a lot of them without my consent even after two emails clearly warning them to confirm with me first then they can proceed with payment. People were transfering funds that were extremely hard to trace , no messege, no institution name, no institution rep name to match the fund transfer to institution. To control the situation we shut down the registration system. I apologize for any inconvenience. Once we clear out all these matters. We will re open the system to allow registered teams to enter their details and team combinations etc.

We are doing our best to help all of you and give everyone a fair chance to participate.

It is impossible for any new institutions or adjudicators to register now. If we accept more teams and adjudicators, it will be purely from the waiting list.

We have no intention to create any inconvenience to any of you. Thank you for your time. Take care! Hope to see you all in Bangkok!

regards,
Tarique

CIMB WUPID: Adjudication Core


Dear all,

The inaugural CIMB Group World Universities Peace Invitational Debate was first conceived with the idea of showcasing an international debating event gathering elites from around the world. For such an event to be a success, not only are debaters important but also the adjudicators.

The organising committee has over the past months deliberated and decided on the following individuals to form the basis of the adjudication core at CIMB WUPID 2007. We are sure and promise institutions attending CIMB WUPID excellent rounds of quality adjudication and have the following individuals to help us deliver that to you.

The adjudication core for the inaugural CIMB WUPID 2007 is:

  • 1) Omar Salahuddin (Chief Adjudicator)
  • 2) Colm Flynn
  • 3) Neill Harvey-Smith
  • 4) Alfred Snider
  • 5) Piyanart Faktorngpan

Each and everyone of the CIMB WUPID adjudication core is no stranger and has had years of experience debating, training and organising tournaments.They have all been instrumental in nurturing debate champions and we look forward to WUPID as a debating event showcasing such high powered adjudication.

Regards,

Kamalan

26 September 2007

NTU to bid for Worlds 2010

Dear All,
The following has been sent to me for distribution on the relevant listserves. Please forward accordingly. Thanks very much.

Cheers,
Ian

--Forwarded Message Attachment--

Hi Ian
Following from our earlier discussions, I am proud to inform you that NTU (Singapore) will be bidding for the Worlds Universities Debating Championships in 2010. We will be presenting a comprehensive bid during the Assumption Worlds later this year.

We believe that our track-record in hosting major international tournaments (All-Asians 1994 and 1997, Australasians 2001, Worlds 2004, AUDC 2005) will stand us in good stead as we seek to host yet another great Worlds. While retaining the formidable efficiency from our 2004 edition, we promise a great deal more fun and some spectacular socials in 2010.

We have already obtained the complete backing of our university and roped in sponsors. Our work with airlines, hotels and corporates have yielded very positive results so far. Now we feel it is time to get the input of all potential participants and the broader debating community. We hope to hear from everyone regarding their expectations from our bid, on all matters including debating, adjudication, costs, accomodations and socials. We intend to working towards giving everyone the Worlds as they want it.

The bid website is up at www.ntu.edu.sg/worlds2010 and all queries/feedback/comments can be emailed to ntuworlds2010@gmail.com

We hope you can help forward this message to the Worlds community and thus formally announcing our bid. We hope to working closely with you in the coming months as we finalise the details of our bid.

Thank you

Vikram Balasubramanian
(on behalf of the NTU Worlds 2010 Bid Committee)

24 September 2007

Australian Women's Parliamentary Debating Championships

Australian Women's Parliamentary Debating Championships 2007

Results have just come in from Melbourne:

Winners: University of Queensland 1 (Alice Heathcote and Lauren Humphrey)

Runners-up: Victoria University of Wellington 1 (Sayeqa Islam and Polly Higbee), University of Sydney 1 (Julia Fetherston and Naomi Hart) and Sydney/Melbourne (Elizabeth Ames and Sienna Merope)

Best Speaker: Sayeqa Islam (Victoria University of Wellington 1)

Speaker Tab:
1. Sayeqa Islam (Victoria University of Wellington 1)
2. Alice Heathcote (University of Queensland 1)
3= Polly Higbee (Victoria University of Wellington 1)
3= Lauren Humphrey (University of Queensland 1)
5.
6. Elizabeth Ames (University of Sydney Union)
7. Julia Fetherston (University of Sydney Union)
8.
9.
10.

More to come.